<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawaii UFO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/</link>
	<description>Striving to increase awareness of our spiritual natures as well as the news, technologies and agendas in our world which influence them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...  I think that the interesting thing is that even if the scientist DID believe that the UFO was military, extraterrestrial or of some other unconventional origin, chances are he wouldn&#039;t have said so in this setting.  ...but I don&#039;t see anything controversial about calling it a UFO: It is an object...that was flying...and is unidentified!  

The problem is that scientists, rather than actually giving their opinion, often feel as if they are obligated to *represent* the accepted body of orthodox scientific knowledge.  There is plenty of professional social pressure to account for this.  So, if his explanation is ridiculous, I would sooner blame the *business of science*, rather than the scientist himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;  I think that the interesting thing is that even if the scientist DID believe that the UFO was military, extraterrestrial or of some other unconventional origin, chances are he wouldn&#8217;t have said so in this setting.  &#8230;but I don&#8217;t see anything controversial about calling it a UFO: It is an object&#8230;that was flying&#8230;and is unidentified!  </p>
<p>The problem is that scientists, rather than actually giving their opinion, often feel as if they are obligated to *represent* the accepted body of orthodox scientific knowledge.  There is plenty of professional social pressure to account for this.  So, if his explanation is ridiculous, I would sooner blame the *business of science*, rather than the scientist himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>Hi Angela,

I watched the vid.  The scientist said jet contrails?  Don&#039;t mean to be funny, but I&#039;ve seen jet trails before, that didn&#039;t look like jet trails to me.

Very interesting and backs up a line thought I&#039;ve been having about scientists sometimes handing out their explanations as guesses and arguments from authority.

Rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Angela,</p>
<p>I watched the vid.  The scientist said jet contrails?  Don&#8217;t mean to be funny, but I&#8217;ve seen jet trails before, that didn&#8217;t look like jet trails to me.</p>
<p>Very interesting and backs up a line thought I&#8217;ve been having about scientists sometimes handing out their explanations as guesses and arguments from authority.</p>
<p>Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>A very good question.  If you read my preceding posts on this subject, you&#039;ll see when I saw something similar to this was just before the earthquake/hurricane fizzling out.  In my heart of hearts I think it&#039;s something military, but I can&#039;t know for sure or what it is exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good question.  If you read my preceding posts on this subject, you&#8217;ll see when I saw something similar to this was just before the earthquake/hurricane fizzling out.  In my heart of hearts I think it&#8217;s something military, but I can&#8217;t know for sure or what it is exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfingthetao.com/2007/09/20/hawaii-ufo/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a deceptively simple question: What do you think it is, and why do you think it was there?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a deceptively simple question: What do you think it is, and why do you think it was there?  <img src='http://surfingthetao.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
